Podcast Joys

At my most recent job, they allowed me to listen to podcasts while I worked.  I wanted to share some of the best of what I’ve listened to over the past few months.

HOMEBREWED CHRISTIANITY:

An old John Crossan interview: The First Christmas

Peter Rollins, Kester Brewin….: Plundering Religion

Roland Boer: A Calvinist Communist

Phyllis Tickle: On Emergence Christianity

Justin Lee: Rescuing the Gospel

Will Henderson of Slave Free Earth: Heaven, Hell, and Human Trafficking

This American Life

THIS AMERICAN LIFE

Harper High School, Part 1

Harper High School, Part 2

Heretics

Surrogates

Self-Improvement Kick

Also, this Zizek movie:

Weapons and Jesus

He shall judge between the nations,
and shall decide disputes for many peoples;
and they shall beat their swords into plowshares,
and their spears into pruning hooks;
nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
neither shall they learn war anymore.
(Isaiah 2:4 ESV)

Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.
(Matthew 26:52 ESV)

He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
(Luke 22:36 ESV)

From the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and the violent take it by force.  (Matthew 11:12 ESV)

I don’t think people should have guns.  But they do.

The truth is, if the Galileans and Judeans had had guns, and the Romans only swords, history would not have recorded Jesus.  Unless he used his guns to defend the poor, the weak, and the marginalized.

I must say, I like the non-violent Jesus, but I’m not sure that’s one we find in Scripture.  You see, non-violent resistance was really made famous by Ghandi and MLK.  They were awesome.  But they also had mass media.  The English Newspaper’s for Ghandi, and the TV for MLK. For a non-violence movement, you need a good portion of the masses on your side and participating in marches and discussions.  The Jesus movement was small.  He warned against a futile effort of resisting imperial rule with violence, not unlike Isaiah who warned against futile alliances with Egypt.  That’s the most we can say in terms of Jesus and weapons.

But at the same time, I’m proud of humanity when they stand up to tyrants.  Perhaps it’s because I was a student of Elie Wiesel.  Perhaps it’s because I recognize the seeming absence of the divine in Auschwitz or in the plundering women and cities by empires or name your tragedy.  Our canon recognizes this absence too, no?

So, please, stand up against gun violence in America.  Make the restrictions stronger or take guns away.  But making Jesus say things about guns that he did not is supporting the narrative and ideology that Americans are under the danger of imperial rule.  Gun violence in America has little to do with the context of the Bible.  Jesus was under imperial rule, Americans are victims of their “freedoms.”  And it’s not much better out there in the rest of the world, either.

Justin Lee’s Bed

Allow me a moment of reflection

and appreciation…

By the time I graduated high school, my allowance had helped fund the Contemporary Christian music scene.  Of course, I listened to Amy Grant, Michael W. Smith, dc talk, and Jars of Clay.  But in my evangelical nerdiness, I knew they were just the pop groups.  For me, there was a much better CCM scene if one chose to look for it, namely poor old lu and The Prayer Chain.  Liking such an esoteric group of bands made it difficult to connect with anyone that I had not introduced the music to myself.  And in fact, one of the only other people in my life I’d ever met that knew who these bands were: Justin Lee.

Just a few weeks before I was to begin my freshman year at Wake Forest University, other new freshman from the Raleigh area gathered to make connections.  That’s where I met Justin, and towards the end of the night we discovered our similar taste in music.  So clearly, when we arrived on campus, we found each other and hung out, listening to awesome classics like this:

Shortly into our friendship, I remember sitting on Justin’s bed at midnight, talking the night away… while his poor roommate was trying to sleep on the top bunk.  For a while, Justin was hinting at something that either I didn’t want to hear or that I was to dense too pick up on.  But finally he said it, “I’m gay.”

I can’t remember how I responded, nothing too outrageous to be sure.  But I’m sure I responded with something like, “God loves you no matter what.”  The implied meaning being, “no matter what the sin.”  Homosexuality was a sin, you see.  He told me he was gay on a Saturday night, and I immediately took him to church with me the next morning.

You see, I’d already fallen out with my Dad in middle school, because his Church (not mine) had chosen to marry same-sex couples.  We kept a good relationship, but almost never breached the topic of Church, a topic that enveloped most of my life.  And so, when Justin confessed to me, I responded defensively.

But truthfully, that experience shattered my worldview.   I never recovered, although the change was slow.  After I transferred out of Wake Forest, I really never talked to Justin again.  But from that moment on his bed, I never spoke publicly or privately against homosexuality in relation to Christianity.

Now, I’ve grown into an ally who loves the Bible, and finds no problems within the scriptures to prohibit LGBT pastors or marriages within the Church.  And to be honest, I, an existential-feminist-materialistic-ivorytowery-antitheological New Testament scholar, am often not very tolerant of people who interpret the Bible differently.  But that’s the amazing thing about Justin, his tolerance and understanding of both sides, and his ability to provide a space for safe dialogue among Christians.  So for anyone who thinks they know the answers, or for any Christian who’s been touched by this issue, you owe it to yourself and to yours to engage Justin’s voice, to read his story, and to embrace his love for Jesus.

Several times, since that moment on Justin’s bed, I’ve wished I’d responded differently, that I’d been open to the possibilities… not everyone has to look back in regret like me.

[Find Justin's book here and Rachel Held Evans' discussion here.]

Context for Creeds

From Bo Sanders at Homebrewed Christianity on the creeds…

  • They are not timeless and universal expressions. They are very timely and remarkably located.
  • They are not litmus tests for modern orthodoxy. There is no sense in retreating into ecclesiastic silos, playing pre-modern word games, or burying our head in the historical sand. Too much has happened, too much has changed and there is too much on the line.
  • They are not houses to live in. They are lean-tos (temporary shelters) that were erected along the way. We are still to continue our journey and travel on in our day – in the world that is – and not set up camp in the imagined past.

And further reflection on similar issues at The Image of Fish, asking “Why Theology?”:

God is.

End of conversation.

For many folks, those two words are sufficient, and yet, for such a short declarative statement, the sentence “God is.” has quite a bit of baggage packed into it. Whose god? we might ask. The God who allowed the Crusades to happen? The Shoah? Lynchings and slavery? That god? Is that the God that is? And immediately we plunge into other issues.

In light of this, we will be doing a two-part series on “Religious Experience” this week.  Cheers!

Story Saturday: A Lending Parable

Know where this one’s from?

There was a rich man who had a manager, and charges were brought to him that this man was wasting his possessions. And he called him and said to him, ‘What is this that I hear about you? Turn in the account of your management, for you can no longer be manager.’ And the manager said to himself, ‘What shall I do, since my master is taking the management away from me? I am not strong enough to dig, and I am ashamed to beg. I have decided what to do, so that when I am removed from management, people may receive me into their houses.’ So, summoning his master’s debtors one by one, he said to the first, ‘How much do you owe my master?’ He said, ‘A hundred measures of oil.’ He said to him, ‘Take your bill, and sit down quickly and write fifty.’ Then he said to another, ‘And how much do you owe?’ He said, ‘A hundred measures of wheat.’ He said to him, ‘Take your bill, and write eighty.’ The master commended the dishonest manager for his shrewdness. For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light. And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal dwellings.

Science vs. Religion

This is funny and a bit true.

pic.twitter.com/LXuxYnXZ

But scientists (and the religious) would do well to remember Nietzsche:

1) Causes can never be proven, only inferred.

2) The genealogy of knowledge suggests that theories and dominant understandings change over time.  However, they rarely revert to what religious people think.  Most knowledge and theories are on a trajectory, and as this pic suggests, religious thought on science is on the same trajectory, just way behind.